Mark F. Biegger is CHRO at PROCTER & GAMBLE Co (PG). They have made 15 open-market trades across 1 company since 2013, most recently 2017-08-15.
CIK 0000080424
Unrated. We grade insiders only on stock they chose to buy on the open market. Grants, option exercises and vesting say nothing about timing, so they don't count — which is why someone can file often and still have no grade. It isn't a bad sign: unrated buys beat every graded tier below A.
0 open-market purchases, against 15 sales. Too few scored purchases to measure a record yet.
| Ticker | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|
| PG | 23,132 | $3.9M |
Shares reported on the most recent Form 4, priced at the 2017-08-17 close.
| Ticker | Type | Traded | Filed | Price | Value | 7d Stock | 30d Stock | 90d Stock |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PG | SELL | 2017-08-15 | 2017-08-17 | $92.04 | $490K | +0.4% | +1.3% | -4.1% |
| PG | SELL | 2017-02-01 | 2017-02-03 | $87.45 | $5.4M | +4.1% | +3.3% | -1.2% |
| PG | SELL | 2016-08-17 | 2016-08-17 | $86.30 | $159K | +1.6% | +1.3% | -3.8% |
| PG | SELL | 2016-08-15 | 2016-08-17 | $86.60 | $519K | +1.6% | +1.3% | -3.8% |
| PG | SELL | 2016-08-15 | 2016-08-17 | $87.08 | $200K | +1.6% | +1.3% | -3.8% |
| PG | SELL | 2016-08-12 | 2016-08-12 | $87.19 | $1.1M | -0.2% | +0.8% | -5.2% |
| PG | SELL | 2016-08-12 | 2016-08-12 | $87.19 | $1.1M | -0.2% | +0.8% | -5.2% |
| PG | SELL | 2016-08-05 | 2016-08-08 | $85.63 | $2.7M | +1.8% | +2.4% | +0.8% |
| PG | SELL | 2016-08-05 | 2016-08-08 | $85.63 | $1.3M | +1.8% | +2.4% | +0.8% |
| PG | SELL | 2016-01-27 | 2016-01-29 | $79.01 | $1.7M | +0.5% | -1.1% | -1.8% |
| PG | SELL | 2015-10-26 | 2015-10-26 | $77.46 | $1.2M | -3.2% | +0.0% | -1.9% |
| PG | SELL | 2015-08-18 | 2015-08-19 | $75.21 | $99K | -3.2% | +0.0% | +0.0% |
| PG | SELL | 2014-11-05 | 2014-11-05 | $88.96 | $1.1M | -3.2% | +0.0% | +0.0% |
| PG | SELL | 2014-04-24 | 2014-04-28 | $80.26 | $1.5M | -3.2% | +0.0% | +0.0% |
| PG | SELL | 2013-02-01 | 2013-02-04 | $75.70 | $1.4M | -3.2% | +0.0% | +0.0% |
Grouped by shared companies and similar filing behaviour. This is a similarity measure, not a ranking or a performance signal.