Mark A. Schulz is Director at DANA INC (DAN). They have made 16 open-market trades across 2 companies since 2009, most recently 2026-01-02.
CIK 0001190854
Unrated. We grade insiders only on stock they chose to buy on the open market. Grants, option exercises and vesting say nothing about timing, so they don't count — which is why someone can file often and still have no grade. It isn't a bad sign: unrated buys beat every graded tier below A.
3 open-market purchases totalling $88K since 2009, against 13 sales. Too few scored purchases to measure a record yet.
| Ticker | Type | Traded | Filed | Price | Value | 7d Stock | 30d Stock | 90d Stock |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAN | SELL | 2017-01-18 | 2017-01-19 | $19.46 | $271K | +2.9% | +0.9% | -7.1% |
| DAN | SELL | 2016-12-01 | 2016-12-05 | $17.37 | $87K | +5.2% | +10.4% | +5.2% |
| DAN | SELL | 2016-09-02 | 2016-09-02 | $14.60 | $298K | +0.6% | +4.4% | +16.7% |
| DAN | SELL | 2016-08-23 | 2016-08-24 | $14.43 | $157K | +3.4% | +7.9% | +21.2% |
| DAN | SELL | 2015-02-03 | 2015-02-04 | $22.35 | $112K | -13.9% | +2.9% | +2.9% |
| DAN | SELL | 2014-08-19 | 2014-08-21 | $23.49 | $168K | -13.9% | +2.9% | +2.9% |
| DAN | SELL | 2014-03-04 | 2014-03-05 | $23.78 | $261K | -13.9% | +2.9% | +2.9% |
| PCAR | BUY | 2013-11-14 | 2013-11-14 | $56.70 | $57K | -4.7% | +1.4% | +1.4% |
| DAN | SELL | 2013-11-14 | 2013-11-18 | $19.20 | $192K | -13.9% | +2.9% | +2.9% |
| DAN | SELL | 2013-08-13 | 2013-08-15 | $22.49 | $256K | -13.9% | +2.9% | +2.9% |
| DAN | SELL | 2013-03-06 | 2013-03-08 | $17.30 | $173K | -13.9% | +2.9% | +2.9% |
| DAN | SELL | 2013-01-28 | 2013-01-29 | $16.80 | $101K | -13.9% | +2.9% | +2.9% |
| DAN | SELL | 2012-03-09 | 2012-03-12 | $16.06 | $318K | -13.9% | +2.9% | +2.9% |
| DAN | SELL | 2011-06-07 | 2011-06-08 | $16.99 | $333K | -13.9% | +2.9% | +2.9% |
| DAN | BUY | 2009-08-17 | 2009-08-19 | $4.27 | $26K | -13.9% | +2.9% | +2.9% |
| DAN | BUY | 2009-03-27 | 2009-03-30 | $0.60 | $6K | -13.9% | +2.9% | +2.9% |
Grouped by shared companies and similar filing behaviour. This is a similarity measure, not a ranking or a performance signal.